4.1x ROI in six months.
Three markets. Zero existing contacts.
Liang Tuang International had spent two years trying to build pipeline in North America and Europe on their own. We launched into the UK, US, and EU simultaneously and built the outbound infrastructure that two years of self-managed effort had not produced.
Two years of trying to build international pipeline alone. No infrastructure to show for it.
Liang Tuang International had spent two years attempting to build pipeline in North America and Europe on their own. The offer was not the problem. The team had a strong service, a clear value proposition, and a leadership group that understood both target markets well. What they did not have was infrastructure.
No prospect data built for the UK, US, or EU. No outbound playbook written for any of those markets specifically. No sending infrastructure, no sequencing logic, no system for testing what worked in one market against another. Two years of ad hoc effort had produced a handful of warm introductions and nothing that resembled a repeatable engine.
Entering three markets at once is normally a reason to slow down and phase the rollout. Liang Tuang needed the opposite: a way to move into all three simultaneously without diluting the message or the infrastructure required to support it.
Three markets, three local ICP builds, one launch date.
We built local ICP lists from scratch for each market rather than running a single generic list across all three. The UK, US, and EU buyer for Liang Tuang's services shared a job title in most cases but not always the same trigger, the same regulatory context, or the same objection pattern. Treating them as one audience would have flattened all three.
Cold email sequences were written specifically for each market context: language calibrated to local business norms, references and proof points adjusted to what would land with a UK buyer versus a US or EU one, and send timing built around each region's working hours rather than a single blended schedule. LinkedIn outreach ran in parallel across all three markets using the same market-specific logic.
All three sequences launched on the same date. None of the three markets waited on the others, and none of the three diluted the others. The infrastructure was built once and localised three ways.
Six-month results across three new markets.
One market's playbook is not three markets' playbook with a find-and-replace.
The instinct when entering several markets at once is to build one strong sequence and adapt the company name and currency symbol per region. That approach produces a campaign that performs adequately everywhere and well nowhere. A UK buyer, a US buyer, and an EU buyer do not share the same trigger events, regulatory pressures, or tolerance for directness in a first message.
Building three local ICPs and three local sequences in week one cost more time up front than a single generic build would have. It is also the reason all three markets produced qualified replies in the same two-week window rather than one market working and the other two needing a rebuild three months in.
That is the same principle behind every ConnectLead international engagement: a market is not a variable to swap in a template, it is a different buyer with different reasons to say yes.
Entering multiple markets at once?
The free strategy call covers which markets to prioritise, what local ICP differences actually matter for your offer, and what a simultaneous multi-market launch looks like in practice. Written blueprint included.
Free · No commitment · 1 business day response